Цифровая трансформация и экологические показатели деятельности компании: роль зарубежного опыта руководства
Аннотация
Цифровая трансформация и экологические показатели деятельности фирмы стали основными темами в области устойчивого развития компании. Однако лишь немногие публикации изучали влияние характеристик руководства на данную взаимосвязь. В нашей статье мы стремимся заполнить этот пробел, исследуя воздействие цифровой трансформации на экологические показатели деятельности фирмы с особым вниманием к регулирующей роли зарубежного опыта руководства. Чтобы проанализировать влияние и различия между компаниями, мы применили устойчивые эконометрические модели на выборке, состоящей из котирующихся на бирже китайских компаний за 2011–2021г.г. Полученные результаты свидетельствуют о том, что цифровая трансформация существенно повышает экологические показатели деятельности компании. У компаний с невысоким уровнем загрязнения окружающей среды данное положительное воздействие выражено сильнее, чем у компаний с высоким уровнем загрязнения. Кроме того, мы считаем зарубежный опыт руководства решающим регулирующим фактором, усиливающим положительную связь между цифровой трансформацией и экологическими показателями деятельности компании. Настоящее исследование предоставляет ценные данные компаниям, реализующим стратегии устойчивого развития при помощи цифровой трансформации с акцентом на важность зарубежного опыта руководства в улучшении экологических показателей.
Скачивания
Литература
Doan T., Iskandar-Datta M. Are female top executives more risk-averse or more ethical? Evidence from corporate cash holdings policy. Journal of Empirical Finance. 2019;55:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005
Bonfanti A., Mion G., Brunetti F., et al. The contribution of manufacturing companies to the achievement of sustainable development goals: An empirical analysis of the operationalization of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;32(4):2490–2508. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3260
Pu T. Do financing constraints moderate the effect of digital transformation on corporate cash holdings? Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance Research = Korporativnye finansy. 2024;18(3):49–61. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.3.2024.49-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.3.2024.49-61
Wu D., Xie Y., Lyu S. Disentangling the complex impacts of urban digital transformation and environmental pollution: Evidence from smart city pilots in China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022;88:104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104266
Hambrick D.C., Mason P.A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review. 1984;9(2):193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Aini S.N., Harymawan I., Nasih M., et al. CEO overseas experience and sustainability report disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024;31(6):5837–5849. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2883
Alkaraan F., Albitar K., Hussainey K., et al. Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;175:121423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423
Wernerfelt B. A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1984;5(2):171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Ferreira N.C.M.Q.F., Ferreira J.J.M. The field of resource-based view research: mapping past, present and future trends. Management Decision. 2025;63(4):1124-1153 https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2023-1908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1908
Pu T., Zulkafli A.H. How does digital transformation affect innovation quality? E&M Ekonomie a Management. 2024;27(4):16–32. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2024-5-021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2024-5-021
Popli M., Ahsan F.M., Mukherjee D. Upper echelons and firm internationalization: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Business Research. 2022;152:505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.048
Qin J., Lin J. CEO foreign experience and corporate digital transformation: moderating effects of firm resources. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2024;1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2405982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2405982
Arsecularatne B.P., Rodrigo N., Chang R. Review of Reducing Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions through Digital Twin in Built Environment. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;98:111150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111150
Kurniawan T.A., Othman M.H.D., Liang X., et al. Decarbonization in waste recycling industry using digitalization to promote net-zero emissions and its implications on sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023;338:117765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117765
Warner K.S.R., Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning. 2018;52(3):326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Wang B., Lin Z., Wang M., et al. Applying blockchain technology to ensure compliance with sustainability standards in the PPE multi-tier supply chain. International Journal of Production Research. 2022;61(4):4934–4950. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2025944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2025944
Pirzada K., Ahmed K., Moens G. Aligning Corporate Strategies with the Sustainable Development Goals. Foresight and STI Governance. 2023;17(2):5-7. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.2.5.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.2.5.7
Hambrick D.C. Upper Echelons Theory: an update. Academy of Management Review. 2007;32(2):334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Pu T., Zulkafli A. Global minds, local impact: Exploring the effect of foreign directors on corporate R&D expenditure. Strategic Management. 2024;30(2):33-48. https://doi.org/10.5937/straman2400007p DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2400007P
Yu D., Hu K., Hao Y. Can China’s leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy promote corporate emissions reduction? Carbon Management. 2024;15(1): 2317282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2317282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2317282
Uyar A., Al‐Shaer H., Kuzey C., et al. Do foreign directors reinforce better waste management? The moderating role of eco‐innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2023;33(3):2040–2065. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3589
Pu T., Zulkafli A.H. Managerial ownership and corporate innovation: evidence of patenting activity from Chinese listed manufacturing firms. Cogent Business & Management. 2024;11(1): 2289202. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2289202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2289202
Doz Y.L., Bartlett C.A., Prahalad C.K. Global competitive pressures and host country demands managing tensions in MNCs. California Management Review. 1981;23(3):63–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/41172603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41172603
González‐Benito J., González‐Benito Ó. A study of determinant factors of stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 201019(3):164–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.631
Pu T., Zulkafli A.H. State Ownership Heterogeneity and Corporate Innovation: New Evidence from a Hierarchical Perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance Research = Korporativnye finansy. 2024;18(1):20–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.1.2024.20-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.1.2024.20-36
Teece D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28(13):1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Doan T.N., Vu C.T.K. Managerial practices and firms’ environmental performance: An international evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024;31(6):6083–6102. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2910
Varadarajan R. Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: Does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource Advantages? Journal of Business Research. 2023;160:113713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713
Zhang W., Zhao J. Digital transformation, environmental disclosure, and environmental performance: An examination based on listed companies in heavy-pollution industries in China. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2023;87:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.001
Maiurova A., Kurniawan T.A., Kustikova M., et al. Promoting digital transformation in waste collection service and waste recycling in Moscow (Russia): Applying a circular economy paradigm to mitigate climate change impacts on the environment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;354:131604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131604
Xiao D., Xu J., Li Q. The “Double-Edged Sword” effect of air quality information disclosure policy—Empirical evidence based on the digital transformation of Chinese listed companies. Energy Economics. 2024;133:107513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107513
Liu B. Total environmental target constraints and border air pollution effects: deterioration or alleviation? Kybernetes. 2024;ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-08-2024-2189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2024-2189
Kamasak R. The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 2017;26(2):252–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-07-2017-015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-015
Qiu Y., Shaukat A., Tharyan R. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review. 2014;48(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
Bellamy M.A., Dhanorkar S., Subramanian R. Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Operations Management. 2020;66(7-8):895–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1114
Bendig D., Schulz C., Theis L., et al. Digital orientation and environmental performance in times of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;188:122272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122272
Xu Q., Li X., Guo F. Digital transformation and environmental performance: Evidence from Chinese resource‐based enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2023;30(4):1816–1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2457
Mady K., Battour M., Aboelmaged M., et al. Linking internal environmental capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage in manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;417:137928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137928
Zhu D., Chen K., Sun C., et al. Does environmental pollution liability insurance promote environmental performance? Firm-level evidence from quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics. 2023;118:106493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106493
Guo X., Li M., Wang Y., et al. Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia. Journal of Business Research. 2023;163:113868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113868
Yang Y., Han J. Digital transformation, financing constraints, and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2023;30(6):3189–3202. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2546
Pu T. Does digital transformation propel innovation strategies? An empirical investigation based on machine learning and the dynamic GMM approach. E&M Economics and Management. 2025;28(2):81-96. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-012
Zhang W., Xu N., Li C., et al. Impact of digital input on enterprise green productivity: Micro evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;414:137272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137272
Firoozi A.A., Tshambane M., Firoozi A.A., et al. Strategic Load Management: Enhancing Eco-Efficiency in mining operations through automated technologies. Results in Engineering. 2024;24:102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102890
Su J., Wei Y., Wang S., et al. The impact of digital transformation on the total factor productivity of heavily polluting enterprises. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:6386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33553-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33553-w
Copyright (c) 2025 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
