Evaluation of Impact of ESG Rating and Environmental Performance Factors on the Level of Credit Risk and Shareholder Expectations of Companies in Carbon-Intensive Industries from BRICS Countries

Victoria  Agranat

doi:10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.17.2.2023.68-84

Victoria Agranat AliExpress, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3191-7041

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.17.2.2023.68-84

Keywords: climate risk, credit rating, EV/Sales, ESG score

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of ESG ratings, environmental (E) pillar scores and environmental performance metrics of non-financial companies from BRICS countries on their credit risks (measured by credit rating) and shareholder expectations (measured by enterprise value (EV) to sales multiple). Environmental performance metrics included emission scores, water efficiency scores, environmental management team scores and the ability to cope with climate risks scores. The relevance of the study is underpinned by the limited number of research in the field for BRICS countries and contradictory conclusions in research about the strength and direction of the influence of ESG factors on
the value and financial metrics of the companies. The ordered logit regression and OLS regression models were applied for credit ratings and EV/Sales multiple respectively. The sample included 206 companies from carbon-intensive industries from Brazil, China, India, South Africa and Russia for 2018-2021. Financial and ESG metrics were taken from Refinitiv while companies' credit ratings were taken from Moody’s and S&P. The results showed that the improvements in ESG and E-scores as well as environmental performance metrics hurt companies’ credit ratings. Conversely, the improvements in ESG, E-scores and environmental performance metrics had a positive impact on EV/Sales metrics. The latter confirms the TGMT (too-much-of-a-good-thing) effect of environmental performance as equity investors expect a positive effect from climate-related actions on equity performance in the long term.

Downloads

References

United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26). 2021. URL: https://ukcop26.org/ (accessed on 10.04.2022).

Thomson Reuters. URL: https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en.html (accessed on 10.04.2022).

Tillier N. ESG and credit rating agencies: The pressure accelerates. ING Bank N.V. Feb. 22, 2021. URL: https://think.ing.com/articles/esg-and-credit-ratings-the-pressure-has-accelerated/ (accessed on 10.04.2022).

DataBank. World development indicators. The World Bank Group. URL: https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=EN.ATM.CO2E.PP.GD&country (accessed on 11.04.2022).

Impact of climate risks and sustainable development of the financial sector of the Russian Federation: Report for public consultation. Moscow: Bank of Russia; 2020. 35 p. URL: https://cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/108263/Consultation_Paper_200608.pdf (accessed on 30.04.2022). (In Russ.).

Eckstein D., Künzel V., Schäfer L. Global climate risk index 2021: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2019 and 2000-2019. Bonn: Germanwatch e.V.; 2021. 52 p. URL: https://www.germanwatch.org/sites/default/files/Global%20Climate%20Risk%20Index%202021_1.pdf (accessed on 10.04.2022).

Preston L.E., O’Bannon D.P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society. 1997:36(4):419-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406

Hart S.L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review. 1995:20(4):986-1014. DOI: 10.2307/258963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963

Trumpp C., Guenther T. Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017:26(1):49-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900

Nandy M., Lodh S. Do banks value the eco-friendliness of firms in their corporate lending decision? Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2012;25:83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.008

Chodnicka-Jaworska P. ESG as a measure of credit ratings. Risks. 2021;9(12):226. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9120226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9120226

Kouloukoui D. et al. Factors influencing the perception of exposure to climate risks: Evidence from the world’s largest carbon-intensive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;306:127160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127160

Baer M., Kastl J., Kleinnijenhuis A., Thomae J., Caldecott B. The cost for the financial sector if firms delay climate action. Oxford: Oxford Sustainable Finance Group; 2021. 40 p. URL: https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-02/The-Cost-for-the-Financial-Sector-if-Firms-Delay-Climate-Action.pdf (accessed on 10.04.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4095645

ESG impact is rarely credit positive. FitchRatings. Feb. 07, 2022. URL: https://www.fitchratings.com/research/structured-finance/esg-impact-is-rarely-credit-positive-07-02-2022 (accessed on 10.04.2022).

Shitikov V., Mastitskii S. Modeling ordinal and counting variables. In: Shitikov V., Mastitskii S. Classification, regression and other data mining algorithms using R. 2017. URL: https://ranalytics.github.io/data-mining/081-Logit-for-Count.html (accessed on 30.04.2022). (In Russ.).

Karminskii A. Company ratings and their modeling. In: Proc. 10th Int. sci. conf. on the problems of development of the economy and society (in 3 books). Book 1. Moscow: SU-HSE; 2010:372-383. https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/dmwt8m6g6k/78423642.pdf (In Russ.).

Long-term rating scales comparison. BIS. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/qis/qisrating.htm (accessed on 10.04.2022).

General criteria: S&P global ratings’ national and regional scale mapping tables. S&P Global Ratings. Aug. 14, 2017. URL: https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/10194514 (accessed on 10.04.2022).

Information on the comparison of rating scales of Russian credit rating agencies. Bank of Russia. Dec. 30, 2021. URL: https://cbr.ru/press/pr/?file=30122021_101000PR2021-12-30T10_03_38.htm (accessed on 30.04.2022). (In Russ.).

ESG in credit ratings. S&P Global Ratings. URL: https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research-insights/special-reports/esg-in-credit-ratings (accessed on 30.04.2022).