Влияние ESG-рейтингов на денежные потоки ETF
Аннотация
Целью работы является изучение влияния рейтинга экологического, социального и корпоративного управления (ESG) при принятии инвестиционных решений на рынках облигационных ETF и ETF на акции США в период до пандемии. Изменение привлекательности ETF-инвестиций в зависимости от показателя ESG определялось на основании чистых денежных потоков.
В качестве метода оценки применялись регрессионные модели. В частности, использовались линейная модель со смешанными эффектами и метод наименьших квадратов. Было выявлено, что в среднем ETF, отвечающие критериям ESG, привлекли больший объем чистых активов по сравнению с обычными ETF. Данные результаты свидетельствуют о том, что среди инвесторов наблюдается предрасположенность к ESG-инвестициям и уделяется внимание информации о соответствии ETF фондов критериям ESG. С другой стороны, мы обнаружили подтверждение того, что высокое значение ESG-рейтинга обеспечивает существенный приток инвестиций: при этом, различие в ESG-рейтингах не объясняет разницу в объемах чистого денежного потока. Таким образом исследование показывает, что на рынке ETF инвесторы руководствуются не только профилем риск-доходность, но также принимают решения на основании нефинансовых характеристик активов. Полученные результаты имеют практическую значимость. Во-первых, для компаний внедрение ESG-практик может повысить привлекательность их бизнеса для потенциальных инвесторов. Во-вторых, участники рынка выиграют от растущей прозрачности и единообразия методологий присвоения рейтинга.
Скачивания
Литература
Kanamura T. Risk mitigation and return resilience for high yield bond ETFs with ESG components. Finance Research Letters. 2021;41:101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101866
Fama E.F., French K.R. Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices. Journal of financial economics. 2007;83(3):667-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003
Pedersen L.H., Fitzgibbons S., Pomorski L. Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021;142(2):572-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
Broadstock D.C., Chan K., Cheng L.T., et al. The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance research letters. 2021;38:101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Hartzmark S.M., Sussman A.B. Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance. 2019;74(6):2789-2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841
Pagano M., Sánchez Serrano A., Zechner J. Can EFTs Contribute to Systemic Risk? ESRB: Advisory Scientific Committee Reports. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723329
Ben-David I., Franzoni F., Moussawi R. Exchange-traded funds. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 2017;9:169-189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032538
Cremers K.M., Fulkerson J.A., Riley T.B. Challenging the conventional wisdom on active management: A review of the past 20 years of academic literature on actively managed mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal. 2019;75(4):8-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1628555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1628555
Kanuri S. Risk and return characteristics of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) equity ETFs. The Journal of Index Investing Fall. 2020;11(2):66-75. https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.1.092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.1.092
Pavlova I., de Boyrie M.E. ESG ETFs and the COVID-19 stock market crash of 2020: Did clean funds fare better? Finance Research Letters. 2022;44:102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102051
Folger-Laronde Z., Pashang S., Feor L., et al. ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2022;12(2):490-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814
Ben-David I., Li J., Rossi A., Song Y. What do mutual fund investors really care about?. The Review of Financial Studies. 2022;35(4):1723-1774. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab081
Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020. URL: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/trends-report-2020/ (Accessed on 07.06.2023)
Gillan S.L., Koch A., Starks L.T. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2021;66:101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Borgers A., Derwall J., Koedijk K., et al. Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015;60:112-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001
Barko T., Cremers M., Renneboog L. Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;180:777-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z
Amel-Zadeh A, Serafeim G. Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. Financial Analysts Journal. 2018;74(3):87-103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
Hong H., Kacperczyk M. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of financial economics. 2009;93(1):15-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
Auer B.R., Schuhmacher F. Do socially (ir) responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2016;59:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002
Martin P.R., Moser D.V. Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2016;61(1):239-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.004
Karpf A., Mandel A. Does it pay to be green? Socially Responsible Investment eJournal. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2923484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2923484
Baker M., Bergstresser D., Serafeim G., et al. Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of US green bonds. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2018. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25194
Rompotis G.G. The ESG ETFs in the UK. Journal of Asset Management. 2022;23(2):114-129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00251-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00251-z
Hockerts K., Moir L. Communicating corporate responsibility to investors: The changing role of the investor relations function. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;52:85-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16
Adams C.A., Frost G.R. Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting forum. 2008;32(4):288-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002
Searcy C., Buslovich R. Corporate perspectives on the development and use of sustainability reports. Journal of business ethics. 2014;121:149-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1701-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1701-7
Slager R., Chapple W. Carrot and stick? The role of financial market intermediaries in corporate social performance. Business & Society. 2016;55(3):398-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575291
Widyawati L. A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(2):619-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
Chatterji A.K., Levine D.I., Toffel M.W. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 2009;18(1):125-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x
Hartzmark S.M. The worst, the best, ignoring all the rest: The rank effect and trading behavior. The Review of Financial Studies. 2015;28(4):1024-1059. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu079
Gyönyörová L., Stachoň M., Stašek D. ESG ratings: relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of sustainable finance & investment. 2023;13(2):1075-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062
Rook D.P. How can we know if investors are coherently linking sustainability concepts?. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2012;2(3-4):198-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2012.742634
Cornell B. ESG preferences, risk and return. European Financial Management. 2021;27(1):12-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12295
Avramov D., Cheng S., Lioui A., et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics. 2022;145(2B):642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
Krasnikov A., Jayachandran S. The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of marketing. 2008;72(4):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001
Clifford C.P., Fulkerson J.A., Jordan B.D. What drives ETF flows? Financial Review. 2014;49(3):619-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12049
Oztekin A. Information fusion-based meta-classification predictive modeling for ETF performance. Information Systems Frontiers. 2016;20:223-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9704-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9704-4
Bollen N.P. Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis. 2007;42(3):683-708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004142
Renneboog L., Ter Horst J., Zhang C. Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2011;20(4):562-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003
Simpson C., Rathi A. How to get an ESG rating upgrade. Bloomberg; December 21, 2021. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-21/how-to-get-an-esg-rating-upgrade (Accessed 06.07.2023).
Lee C.C., Chen M.P., Lee C.C. Investor attention, ETF returns, and country-specific factors. Research in International Business and Finance. 2021;56:101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101386
The rise of the sustainable fund market and its role in financing sustainable development. Geneva; 2021. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2021d1_en.pdf (Accessed 06.07.2023).
Statista Research Department. Global ESG ETF assets 2006-2022. 2022. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1297487/assets-of-esg-etfs-worldwide/ (Accessed 06.07.2023).
Yu E.P., Van Luu B., Chen C.H. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance. 2020;52:101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
Friede G. Why don't we see more action? A metasynthesis of the investor impediments to integrate environmental, social, and governance factors. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(6):1260-1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2346
In S.Y., Rook D., Monk A. Integrating alternative data (also known as ESG data) in investment decision making. Global Economic Review. 2019;48(3):237-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2019.1643059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2019.1643059
Copyright (c) 2024 НИУ ВШЭ

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.