Оценка влияния результативности практик инклюзивного роста на финансовые показатели и стоимость металлургических компаний
Аннотация
В статье рассматриваются практики инклюзивного роста, применяемые в металлургических компаниях, и оценивается их влияние на финансовые показатели и стоимость компании. Анализ данных 102 крупнейших компаний металлургической отрасли в период с 2016 по 2021 г. показал, что сокращение выбросов парниковых газов, улучшение качества воздуха, переработка отходов, выстраивание инклюзивной цепочки поставок, соблюдение прав человека и выстраивание отношений с обществом в местах присутствия компании положительно влияют на ее финансовые показатели и стоимость. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы топ-менеджерами металлургических компаний для формирования стратегии инклюзивного роста, отвечающей целям всех заинтересованных сторон, которая позволит улучшить финансовые показатели и способствовать росту стоимости компании.
Скачивания
Литература
Alexander O., Charles A., Kastoun R., et al. Asset and wealth management revolution 2022: Exponential expectations for ESG. PricewaterhouseCoopers; 2022. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/financial-services/asset-management/publications/asset-and-wealth-management-revolution-2022.html (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Pérez L., Hunt V., Samandari H., et al. Does ESG really matter and why? The McKinsey Quarterly; 2022. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/does%20esg%20really%20matter%20and%20why/does-esg-really-matter-and-why-vf.pdf (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Beal D., Eccles R., Hansell G., et al. Total societal impact: A new lens for strategy. Boston Consulting Group; 2017. URL: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/total-societal-impact-new-lens-strategy (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Ritchie H., Rosado P., Roser M. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. 2023. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed on 19.07.2023 )
Endrikat J., Guenther E., Hoppe H. Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal. 2014;32(5):735–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004
Levitt T. The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 1958:36:41–50.
Feldman S.J., Soyka P.A. Ameer P.G. Does Improving a Firm’s Environmental Management System and Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price? The Journal of Investing. 1997;6(4):87–97. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.1997.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.1997.87
Preston L.E., O’Bannon D. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. Business and Society. 1997;36:419–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406
King A., Lenox M. Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science. 2002;48(2):289–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.2.289.258
Porter M.E., Van der Linde C. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review. 1995;73:120–134.
Hart S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(4):986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
Hart S. L., Dowell G. Invited Editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm fifteen years after. Journal of Management. 2011;37(5):1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631039021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Donaldson T., Preston L.E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(1):65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Ambec S., Lanoie P. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2008;22(4):45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.35590353
Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of management review. 1979;4(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Creating Shared Value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review. 2011;89:62–77.
Alexander G.J., Buchholz R.A. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. The Academy of Management Journal. 1978;21(3):479–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/255728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255728
Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984. 276 p.
McWilliams A., Siegel D., Wright P. M. Guest editors’ introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43(1):1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
Russo M.V., Fouts P.A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40(3):534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/257052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257052
Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism. NY: The Free Press; 1985.
Cornell B., Shapiro A. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Review. 1987;4:497–. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X0503000301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X0503000301
Peloza J. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review. 2006;48(2):52–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166338
Galant A., Cadez S. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 2017;30(1): 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122
Volkova O.N. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Russian and Dutch Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2022;16(2):15–31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3863541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.2.2022.15-31
Hirsch B.T., Addison J.T. The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. London: Allen & Unwin; 1986. 348 p.
Flaherty S. Strike activity, worker militancy, and productivity change in manufacturing, 1961–1981. ILR Review. 1987;40(4):585–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398704000410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398704000410
Freeman R.B., Medoff J.L. What do unions do. N.Y. Basic Books; 1984.
Lazear E.P., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of political Economy. 1981;89(5):841–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261010
Gao J. Literature review of executive compensation gap and company performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 2019;9(1):109–123. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.91009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.91009
Olaniyan D. A., Ojo L. B. Staff training and development: A vital tool for organizational effectiveness. European journal of scientific Research. 2008;24(3):326–331.
Khan A.A., Abbasi S.O.B.H., Waseem R.M., et al. Impact of training and development of employees on employee performance through job satisfaction: A study of telecom sector of Pakistan. Business Management and Strategy. 2016;7(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v7i1.9024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v7i1.9024
Gavronski I., Klassen R.D., Vachon S., et al. A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2011;47(6):872–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.018
Vachon S., Klassen R.D. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics. 2008;111(2):299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030
Fahimnia B., Jabbarzadeh A. Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;91:306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.007
Melinda A., Wardhani R. The effect of environmental, social, governance, and controversies on firms’ value: evidence from Asia. In: Barnett W.A., Sergi B.S., Eds. Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Vol. 27). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2020:147-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. In: Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. New York, 1994.
Fisman R.J., Guriev S., Ioramashvili C., et al. Corruption and firm growth: evidence from around the world. Sciences Po publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828225
Ghazieh L., Chebana N. The effectiveness of risk management system and firm performance in the European context. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. 2021;26(52):182–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2019-0118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2019-0118
Bhatia P., Corbier L., Schmitz S., et al. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition). 2017. URL: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Refinitiv Eikon. Environmental, social and governance scores from Refinitiv. May 2022. Available at: https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf
Goddard M., Syed A., Chong A., et al. Mine 2021: Great expectations, seizing tomorrow. PricewaterhouseCooper, 2021. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/energy-utilities-mining/assets/mine-2021/pwc-mine-2021.pdf (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Statista, Statista Search. URL: https://www.statista.com/ (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Copyright (c) 2023 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
