Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Risk-taking in Russian Companies: The Role of Corporate Governance
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and corporate risk-taking in Russian firms, focusing on the moderating effects of corporate governance mechanisms. Using a panel dataset of 126 companies listed on the Moscow Exchange Broad Market Index from 2010 to 2021, the study applies a fixed-effects model to examine how corporate governance factors, including board independence, the presence of a risk committee, and state ownership, influence corporate risk-taking under conditions of economic uncertainty. The results show that economic policy uncertainty is positively related to risk-taking, with corporate governance characteristics moderating this relationship. Specifically, higher board independence and the presence of a dedicated risk committee are associated with reduced risk-taking in periods of increased uncertainty. Conversely, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) exhibit a higher propensity for risk-taking due to the security provided by government backing. These findings contribute to the growing literature on corporate governance and risk management, particularly in emerging markets. This research provides practical insights for corporate managers and policymakers, suggesting the need for tailored governance structures to mitigate risk in volatile economic environments.
Downloads
References
Roggi, O., Damodaran A., Garvey M. (2012, April 1). Risk Taking: A Corporate Governance Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2556159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2556159
Andries A.M., Balutel D., Ihnatov I., et al. The nexus between corporate governance, risk-taking, and growth. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0228371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228371
Wright P., Ferris S.P., Sarin A., et al. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal. 1996;39(2):441-458. (accessed on 10.04.2025) URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/256787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256787
Knight F.H. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1921. 388 p. (accessed on 10.04.2025) URL: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/books/risk/riskuncertaintyprofit.pdf
Kahn B.E., Sarin R.K. Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research. 1988;15(2):265-272. https://doi.org/10.1086/209163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209163
Al‐Thaqeb S.A., Algharabali B.G., Alabdulghafour K.T. The pandemic and economic policy uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2022;27(3):2784-2794. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2298
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992;5(4):297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Tversky A., Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
March J.G., Shapira Z. Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking. Management Science. 1987;33(11):1367-1509. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404
Gneezy U., Potters J. An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997;112(2):631–645. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555217
Zhang C., Yang C., Liu C. Economic policy uncertainty and corporate risk-taking: Loss aversion or opportunity expectations. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;69:101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101640
Wen F., Li C., Sha H., et al. How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2021;41:101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101840
Vural-Yavas З. Corporate risk-taking in developed countries: The influence of economic policy uncertainty and macroeconomic conditions. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 2020;54:100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100616
Haans R.F.J., Pieters C., He Z.-L. Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal. 2016;37(7):1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
Jiraporn P., Chatjuthamard P., Tong S., et al. Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS). Finance Research Letters. 2015;13:105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.02.007
Koirala S., Marshall A., Neupane S., et al. Corporate governance reform and risk-taking: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in an emerging market. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2020;61:101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.007
Ongsakul V., Jiraporn P. How do independent directors view powerful executive risk-taking incentives? A quasi-natural experiment. Finance Research Letters. 2019;31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.016
Bhuiyan M.B.U., Cheema M.A., Man Y. Risk Committee, Corporate Risk-Taking, and Firm Value. Managerial Finance. 2021;47(3):285-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2019-0322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2019-0322
Vo X.V. Do firms with state ownership in transitional economies take more risk? Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance. 2018;46:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.03.002
Zhang W., Zhang X., Tian X., et al. Economic policy uncertainty nexus with corporate risk-taking: The role of state ownership and corruption expenditure. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;65:101496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101496
Peltomäki J., Sihvonen J., Swidler S., et al. Age, gender, and risk‐taking: Evidence from the S&P 1500 executives and market‐based measures of firm risk. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2021;48(9-10):1988–2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12528
Zhang J., Xue C., Zhang J. The Impact of CEO Educational Background on Corporate Risk-Taking in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023;16(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010009
Beber A., Fabbri D. Who times the foreign exchange market? Corporate speculation and CEO characteristics. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2012;18(5):1065–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.07.004
Serfling M.A. CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;25:251–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
Kim K.-H., Buchanan R. CEO Duality Leadership And Firm Risk-Taking Propensity. The Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 2011;24(1):27-42. (accessed on 10.04.2025) URL: https://scispace.com/pdf/ceo-duality-leadership-and-firm-risk-taking-propensity-5atdatocb5.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v24i1.1364
Lin K.J., Karim K., Hu R., et al. Fifty shades of CEO duality: CEO personal risk preference, duality and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 2023;24(3):425-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-02-2022-0034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-02-2022-0034
Baker S.R., Bloom N., Davis S.J. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016;131(4):1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
Boubakri N., Mansi S.A., Saffar W. Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking. Journal of International Business Studies. 2013;44(3):195–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.2
Boubakri N., Cosset J.-C., Saffar, W. The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatisation. Journal of Financial Economics. 2013;108(3):641–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007
Ho T., Phung D.N., Nguyen Y.N. State ownership and corporate risk‐taking: Empirical evidence in Vietnam. Australian Economic Papers. 2021;60(3):466–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12214
Schweizer D., Walker T., Zhang A. Cross-border acquisitions by Chinese enterprises: The benefits and disadvantages of political connections. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2019;57:63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.023
Guan J., Xu H., Huo D., et al. Economic policy uncertainty and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;67:101542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101542
Copyright (c) 2025 National Research University Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.