What Drives Green Bonds Returns and Valuation of the Safe-Assets Effect on Global, Russian and Chinese Markets?

Keywords: green bonds, hedging effects, safe assets

Abstract

This paper identifies the determinants of green bonds on global markets, China and Russia and evaluates the hedging effect of these instruments. We contribute to the existing literature by studying the emerging markets such as Russia and China, providing comparative analysis of the impact of identical factors on green bond yields on global, Russian and Chinese markets, and implementing the methodology for time series analyses that involve studying several subperiods. Based on the sample of 2167, 1213 and 2167 observations for global, Russian and Chinese markets in 2017–2022, respectively, we analyzed the impact of various factors on green bond returns using two empirical methods: analyses of long- and short-term linkages between variables based on the VECM model and construction of the GARCH model. The obtained results revealed that green bonds act like a hedging asset on global, Chinese and Russian markets, which proves that investors can use them to hedge their portfolios during economic crises, policy uncertainties and other market fluctuations. However, the hedging effect of green bonds differs in global, Russia and Chinese markets. In case of China, green bonds have a significant short-term hedging effect for all considered factors, while for the global green bonds the short-term hedging effect is present for all variables except the common stock market index. Russian green bonds can be used for hedging against gold and gas prices both in the short- and long-run. These results show investors how to manage their portfolios more effectively by using green bonds as a hedge asset.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Usman O., Iorember P.T., Jelilov G., et al. Towards mitigating ecological degradation in G-7 countries: accounting for economic effect dynamics, renewable energy consumption, and innovation. Heliyon. 2021;7(12):e08592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08592

Guo D., Zhou P. Green bonds as hedging assets before and after COVID: A comparative study between the US and China. Energy Economics. 2021;104:105696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105696

Yoshino N., Taghizadeh-Hesary F., Otsuka M. Covid-19 and Optimal Portfolio Selection for Investment in Sustainable Development Goals. Finance Research Letters. 2021;38:101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101695

OECD. Mobilising Bond Markets for a Low-Carbon Transition, Green Finance and Investment. OECD Publishing, Paris; 2017. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272323-en

Bouri E., Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad S.J.H., Roubaud D., et al. Bitcoin, gold, and commodities as safe havens for stocks: New insight through wavelet analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2020;77:156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.03.004

Tang Y., Chen X., Sarker P.K., et al. Asymmetric effects of geopolitical risks and uncertainties on green bond markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;189:122348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122348

Cui T., Suleman M.T., Zhang H. Do the green bonds overreact to the COVID-19 pandemic? Finance Research Letters. 2022;49:103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103095

Arif M., Naeem A.M., Farid S., et al. Diversifier or More? Hedge and Safe Haven Properties of Green Bonds During COVID-19. Energy Policy. 2022;168:113102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113102

Arouri M., Mhadhbi M., Shahrour M.H. Dynamic connectedness and hedging effectiveness between green bonds, ESG indices, and traditional assets. European Financial Management. 2025;31(5):1704-1719. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12561

Reboredo J.C., Ugolini A. Price connectedness between green bond and financial markets. Economic Modelling. 2020;88:25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.004

Jiang Y., Wang J., Ao Z., et al. The relationship between green bonds and conventional financial markets: Evidence from quantileon-quantile and quantile coherence approaches. Economic Modelling. 2022;116:106038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106038

Lee C.C., Tang H., Li D. The roles of oil shocks and geopolitical uncertainties on China’s green bond returns. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2022;74:494-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.03.008

Popova T.A., Mitrakova O.V. Costs of issuing green bonds in the Russian market. Journal of Applied Research. 2022;8:1-28. https://doi.org/10.47576/2712-7516_2022_8_1_28

Baur D.G., Lucey B.M. Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review. 2010;45(2):217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x

Baur D.G., McDermott T.K. Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2010;34(8):1886–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.008

Reboredo J.C., Ugolini A. Climate Transition Risk, Profitability and Stock Prices. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2022;83:102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102271

Elsayed A.H., Naifar N., Nasreen S., et al. Dependence structure and dynamic connectedness between green bonds and financial markets: Fresh insights from time-frequency analysis before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Economics. 2022;107:105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105842

Pham L., Nguyen C.P. Asymmetric tail dependence between green bonds and other asset classes. Global Finance Journal. 2021;50:100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100669

Zhang K., Li Y., Qi Y., et al. Can green credit policy improve environmental quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;298:113445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113445

Liu C., Xiong M. Green finance reform and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2022;48:102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102993

Pirtea M.G., Sipos G.L., Ionescu A. Does corruption affects business innovation? Insights from emerging countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2019;20(4):715–733. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10160

Iglesias-Casal A., López-Andión C., López-Penabad M.C., et al. Dynamic correlations and portfolio optimization in socially responsible investments: evidence from Indonesia and South Korea. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2025;12:452. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04753-8

Published
2026-04-28
How to Cite
GrigorievaS., IsaevaN., AzizovaA. and BairamkulovaL. (2026) “What Drives Green Bonds Returns and Valuation of the Safe-Assets Effect on Global, Russian and Chinese Markets?”, Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы | ISSN: 2073-0438, 20(1), pp. 76-85. doi: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.20.1.2026.76-85.
Section
New Research