How Do Inclusive Growth Practices Affect Financial Performance and the Value of Metallurgy Companies?
Abstract
The article examines inclusive growth practices used in metallurgical companies and assesses their impact on financial results and value. An analysis of data from 102 of the largest companies in the metals industry between 2016 and 2021 showed that reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving air quality, proper waste disposal, building an inclusive supply chain, respecting human rights and building community relations in the places where the company operates have a positive impact on its financial results and value. The results of the study can be used by top managers of metallurgical companies to formulate an inclusive growth strategy that meets the interests of all stakeholders, which will improve financial results and contribute to the growth of company value.
Downloads
References
Alexander O., Charles A., Kastoun R., et al. Asset and wealth management revolution 2022: Exponential expectations for ESG. PricewaterhouseCoopers; 2022. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/financial-services/asset-management/publications/asset-and-wealth-management-revolution-2022.html (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Pérez L., Hunt V., Samandari H., et al. Does ESG really matter and why? The McKinsey Quarterly; 2022. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/does%20esg%20really%20matter%20and%20why/does-esg-really-matter-and-why-vf.pdf (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Beal D., Eccles R., Hansell G., et al. Total societal impact: A new lens for strategy. Boston Consulting Group; 2017. URL: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/total-societal-impact-new-lens-strategy (accessed on 19.07.2023)
Ritchie H., Rosado P., Roser M. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. 2023. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed on 19.07.2023 )
Endrikat J., Guenther E., Hoppe H. Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal. 2014;32(5):735–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004
Levitt T. The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 1958:36:41–50.
Feldman S.J., Soyka P.A. Ameer P.G. Does Improving a Firm’s Environmental Management System and Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price? The Journal of Investing. 1997;6(4):87–97. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.1997.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.1997.87
Preston L.E., O’Bannon D. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. Business and Society. 1997;36:419–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406
King A., Lenox M. Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science. 2002;48(2):289–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.2.289.258
Porter M.E., Van der Linde C. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review. 1995;73:120–134.
Hart S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(4):986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
Hart S. L., Dowell G. Invited Editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm fifteen years after. Journal of Management. 2011;37(5):1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631039021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Donaldson T., Preston L.E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(1):65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Ambec S., Lanoie P. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2008;22(4):45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.35590353
Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of management review. 1979;4(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Creating Shared Value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review. 2011;89:62–77.
Alexander G.J., Buchholz R.A. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. The Academy of Management Journal. 1978;21(3):479–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/255728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255728
Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984. 276 p.
McWilliams A., Siegel D., Wright P. M. Guest editors’ introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43(1):1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
Russo M.V., Fouts P.A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40(3):534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/257052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257052
Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism. NY: The Free Press; 1985.
Cornell B., Shapiro A. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Review. 1987;4:497–. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X0503000301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X0503000301
Peloza J. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review. 2006;48(2):52–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166338
Galant A., Cadez S. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 2017;30(1): 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122
Volkova O.N. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Russian and Dutch Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2022;16(2):15–31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3863541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.2.2022.15-31
Hirsch B.T., Addison J.T. The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. London: Allen & Unwin; 1986. 348 p.
Flaherty S. Strike activity, worker militancy, and productivity change in manufacturing, 1961–1981. ILR Review. 1987;40(4):585–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398704000410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398704000410
Freeman R.B., Medoff J.L. What do unions do. N.Y. Basic Books; 1984.
Lazear E.P., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of political Economy. 1981;89(5):841–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261010
Gao J. Literature review of executive compensation gap and company performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 2019;9(1):109–123. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.91009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.91009
Olaniyan D. A., Ojo L. B. Staff training and development: A vital tool for organizational effectiveness. European journal of scientific Research. 2008;24(3):326–331.
Khan A.A., Abbasi S.O.B.H., Waseem R.M., et al. Impact of training and development of employees on employee performance through job satisfaction: A study of telecom sector of Pakistan. Business Management and Strategy. 2016;7(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v7i1.9024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v7i1.9024
Gavronski I., Klassen R.D., Vachon S., et al. A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2011;47(6):872–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.018
Vachon S., Klassen R.D. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics. 2008;111(2):299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030
Fahimnia B., Jabbarzadeh A. Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;91:306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.007
Melinda A., Wardhani R. The effect of environmental, social, governance, and controversies on firms’ value: evidence from Asia. In: Barnett W.A., Sergi B.S., Eds. Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Vol. 27). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2020:147-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. In: Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. New York, 1994.
Fisman R.J., Guriev S., Ioramashvili C., et al. Corruption and firm growth: evidence from around the world. Sciences Po publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828225
Ghazieh L., Chebana N. The effectiveness of risk management system and firm performance in the European context. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. 2021;26(52):182–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2019-0118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2019-0118
Bhatia P., Corbier L., Schmitz S., et al. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition). 2017. URL: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Refinitiv Eikon. Environmental, social and governance scores from Refinitiv. May 2022. Available at: https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf
Goddard M., Syed A., Chong A., et al. Mine 2021: Great expectations, seizing tomorrow. PricewaterhouseCooper, 2021. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/energy-utilities-mining/assets/mine-2021/pwc-mine-2021.pdf (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Statista, Statista Search. URL: https://www.statista.com/ (accessed on 17.04.2023)
Copyright (c) 2023 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
