Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions in Emerging Asian Countries: Effects of Confucianism and Technological Development
Abstract
Asian emerging markets exemplify the contemporary trend of glocalization (globalization-localization). Countries in this region have strong cultural bonds shaped by the influence of Confucianism, which has given rise to a distinctive approach to conducting business, including the realm of mergers and acquisitions. The homogeneity of cultural values fosters trust among parties even in cross-border transactions, impacting the assessment of transaction premiums. Simultaneously, within this region, a cluster of Asian Tiger countries distinguishes itself by leading in technological advancements, particularly in the realm of digitalization. The escalating competitiveness of technologically advanced companies further influences estimates of transaction premiums.
This paper endeavors to delve into the theoretical aspects of these issues and substantiate, through empirical evidence, the cultural impact of Confucianism and technological progress on mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Our research is grounded in a database encompassing 2677 cross-border deals compiled from January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2021, for 10 burgeoning Asian markets. This study marks the first exploration of M&A deal value and firm valuation during transactions utilizing a glocal region as a case study. Our primary findings substantiate the notion that cultural affinities exert a substantial
influence on M&A deal values, with a propensity for lower values among culturally similar countries. Congruent cultural values build trust among stakeholders and safeguard from additional risks. These results give policymakers and business entities an opportunity to adjust their decisions and refine their comprehension of factors that shape the economy.
Downloads
References
CFI Team. Acquisition Premium - Overview, How To Calculate, Reasons. CFI Educ 2022. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/deals/acquisition-premium/ (accessed May 25, 2022).
Smith K V. Comment: A Financial Analysis of Acquisition and Merger Premiums. J Financ Quant Anal 1973;8:159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2330008
Lim J, Makhija AK, Shenkar O. The asymmetric relationship between national cultural distance and target premiums in cross-border M&A. J Corp Financ 2016;41:542–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.007
Wen R. Who asks for higher merger and acquisition premiums? The perspective of national collectivism. China J Account Stud 2017;5:196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2017.1339431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2017.1339431
Yum JO. The Impact Of Confucianism On Interpersonal Relationships And Communication Patterns In East Asia. Commun Monogr 1988;55:374–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376178
Chen GM, Chung J. The Impact of Confucianism on Organizational Communication. Commun Q 1994;42:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369919
Kim KH. Exploring the interactions between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity. J Creat Behav 2007;41:28–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2162-6057.2007.TB01280.X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01280.x
Feng X, Jin Z, Johansson AC. How beliefs influence behaviour: Confucianism and innovation in China. Econ Transit Institutional Chang 2021;29:501–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12277
Wang L, Zhang Y, Wang LN, Fu J. Confucianism and Firm Performance. Front Phys 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHY.2020.00319/FULL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00319
Skorupinska A, Torrent-Sellens J. ICT, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence Based on Eastern European Manufacturing Companies. J Knowl Econ 2017;8:768–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0441-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0441-1
Albiman MM, Sulong Z. The linear and non-linear impacts of ICT on economic growth, of disaggregate income groups within SSA region. Telecomm Policy 2017;41:555–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.07.007
Venturini F. The modern drivers of productivity. Res Policy 2015;44:357–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2014.10.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.011
Fernández-Portillo A, Almodóvar-González M, Hernández-Mogollón R. Impact of ICT development on economic growth. A study of OECD European union countries. Technol Soc 2020;63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101420
Larsen MH. ICT integration in an M&A process. 9th Pacific Asia Conf. Inf. Syst. I.T. Value Creat. PACIS 2005, 2005, p. 1146–59.
Cassiman B, Colombo MG, Garrone P, Veugelers R. The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness. Res Policy 2005;34:195–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.002
Bloomenthal A. Four Asian Tigers Definition. Investopedia 2019. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/four-asian-tigers.asp (accessed May 25, 2022).
Zhang R. How Financing Activities Affect Firm Innovation. PBCSF MBA 2019.
Liou RS, Rao-Nicholson R. Age Matters: The Contingency of Economic Distance and Economic Freedom in Emerging Market Firm’s Cross-Border M&A Performance. Manag Int Rev 2019;59:355–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-019-00381-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-019-00381-y
Chaudhry R, Duveblad C. STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Do Acquirers Offer a Higher Bid Premium to Target Companies as Their Demand Increases? 2010.
Mucenieks K. Factors Affecting Mergers and Acquisitions in the European Union. Humanit Soc Sci Latv 2018;26:102–14. https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.26.2.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.26.2.7
Hitt M, Harrison J, Ireland RD, Best A. Attributes of Successful and Unsuccessful Acquisitions of US Firms. Br J Manag 1998;9:91–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00077
Papadakis VM, Thanos IC. Measuring the performance of acquisitions: An empirical investigation using multiple criteria. Br J Manag 2010;21:859–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00671.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00671.x
Djazuli A. Financial Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Linguist Antverp 2021:3841–53.
Galant A, Cadez S. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Econ Res Istraz 2017;30:676–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122
Setiawati AASMD, Budiartha IK, Ratnadi NMD, Sari MMR. THE ROLE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DICLOSURE IN MODERATING THE EFFECT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ON FIRM VALUE. Russ J Agric Socio-Economic Sci 2018;80:143–8. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2018-08.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2018-08.18
Jongwanich J, Brooks DH, Kohpaiboon A. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions and financial development: Evidence from emerging Asia. Asian Econ J 2013;27:265–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12014
Perafán-Peña HF, Gill-de-Albornoz B, Giner B. Earnings management of target firms and deal premiums: The role of industry relatedness. Br Account Rev 2022;54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101038
Network Readeness Index 2021 n.d. https://networkreadinessindex.org/wp-content/uploads/reports/nri_2021.pdf (accessed May 25, 2022).
Silva DS, Yamashita GH, Cortimiglia MN, Brust-Renck PG, ten Caten CS. Are we ready to assess digital readiness? Exploring digital implications for social progress from the Network Readiness Index. Technol Soc 2022;68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101875
Yoon H, Peillex J, Management PB-BJ of, 2021 undefined. Friends or foes? Bilateral relationships and ownership choice in cross‐border acquisitions by emerging market firms. Wiley Online Libr 2021;32:852–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12442
Barassi MR, Zhou Y. The effect of corruption on FDI: A parametric and non-parametric analysis. Eur J Polit Econ 2012;28:302–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.01.001
Ahammad MF, Tarba SY, Liu Y, Glaister KW, Cooper CL. Exploring the factors influencing the negotiation process in cross-border M&A. Int Bus Rev 2016;25:445–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.06.001
Lee SJ, Kim J, Park B Il. Culture clashes in cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A case study of Sweden’s Volvo and South Korea’s Samsung. Int Bus Rev 2015;24:580–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.016
Yeganeh H. A compound index of cultural dimensions: Implications and applications. Int J Organ Anal 2013;21:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831311322533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831311322533
Roy D. Formulation of Hofstede’s Global Cultural Dimension Index (HGCDI): A cross-country study. J Transnatl Manag 2020;25:195–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2020.1765715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2020.1765715
Habib M, Zurawicki L. Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment. J Int Bus Stud 2002;33:291–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017
Globerman S, Shapiro D. Governance, Multinationals, and Growth. 2005.
Deng P, Yang M. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: A comparative investigation. Int Bus Rev 2015;24:157–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.005.
CFI. Eclectic Paradigm - Overview, OLI Framework, Examples. Corp Financ Inst 2022. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/strategy/eclectic-paradigm/ (accessed May 25, 2022).
Chen J. Eclectic Paradigm Definition. Investopedia 2020:3–5.
Wadhwa K, Reddy S S. Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Asian Countries: The Role of Market Seeking, Resource Seeking and Efficiency Seeking Factors. Int J Bus Manag 2011;6. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p219
Ghazalian PL, Amponsem F. The effects of economic freedom on FDI inflows: an empirical analysis. Appl Econ 2019;51:1111–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1524979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1524979
Gregoriou A, Nguyen BD, Nguyen TD, Le H, Hudson R. Economic policy uncertainty and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Int Rev Financ Anal 2021;78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101911
Bonaime A, Gulen H, Ion M. Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions? J Financ Econ 2018;129:531–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.007
Borthwick J, Ali S, Pan X. Does policy uncertainty influence mergers and acquisitions activities in China? A replication study. Pacific Basin Financ J 2020;62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101381
Javorcik BS, Wei SJ. Corruption and cross-border investment in emerging markets: Firm-level evidence. J Int Money Financ 2009;28:605–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.01.003
Boateng A, Hua X, Uddin M, Du M. Home country macroeconomic factors on outward cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from the UK. Res Int Bus Financ 2014;30:202–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2013.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2013.08.001
Weitzel U, Berns S. Cross-border takeovers, corruption, and related aspects of governance. J Int Bus Stud 2006;37:786–806. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400225
Ma T-C, Ouyang L. Confucianism, growth and democracy. J Econ Dev 2020;22:149–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-11-2019-0066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-11-2019-0066
Worldvaluessurvey.org. WVS Database [online] 2019. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (accessed May 25, 2022).
Deng P, Yang M. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: A comparative investigation. Int Bus Rev 2015;24:157–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2014.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.005
Zakaria R, Fernandez WD, Schneper WD. Resource availability, international acquisition experience, and cross-border M&A target search: A behavioral approach. Multinatl Bus Rev 2017;25:185–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2017-0016/FULL/HTML. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2017-0016
Royle JA, Dorazio RM. Hierarchical models of animal abundance and occurrence. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2006;11:249–63. https://doi.org/10.1198/108571106X129153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571106X129153
Midway S. Chapter 9 Random Effects | Data Analysis in R 2022. https://bookdown.org/steve_midway/DAR/random-effects.html (accessed May 25, 2022).
Williams R. Williams, R. (2015). Panel data 4: Fixed effects... - Академия Google. 2015.
Allison P. Fixed Effects Regression Models. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993869
Gordon J. Theory of the Firm (Economics) - Explained - The Business Professor, LLC. Bus Profr 2023. https://thebusinessprofessor.com/en_US/economic-analysis-monetary-policy/theory-of-the-firm-definition (accessed May 25, 2022).
Austin PC, Leckie G. The effect of number of clusters and cluster size on statistical power and Type I error rates when testing random effects variance components in multilevel linear and logistic regression models. J Stat Comput Simul 2018;88:3151–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1504945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1504945
Fu F, Lin L, Officer MS. Acquisitions Driven by Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good Deals? SSRN Electron J 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1328115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1328115
Harford J, Humphery-Jenner M, Powell RG. The Sources of Value Destruction in Acquisitions by Entrenched Managers. SSRN Electron J 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562247
Malmendier U, Tate G. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. J Financ Econ 2008;89:20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002
Roll R. The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers. J Bus 1986;59:197. https://doi.org/10.1086/296325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296325
Copyright (c) 2023 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
