Green Credit Policy and Corporate Exposure to Climate Risk in the Case of BRICS Countries
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of green credit policy on corporate exposure to climate risk in BRICS countries
in 2000–2024. The objective of this study is to assess the extent to which access to sustainable financing can mitigate both physical and transition climate risks for companies operating in emerging economies. The methodology is based on a panel of listed companies in the BRICS countries, combining financial, climate, and regulatory data from national and international databases. We use the System GMM econometric approach, which corrects for potential endogeneity and biases related to unobserved heterogeneity. The empirical results indicate that access to green credit significantly reduces corporate exposure to climate risk, particularly in carbon-intensive sectors and in countries with strong regulatory frameworks. The effect is more pronounced for large companies and varies depending on the type of risk: transition risk is more effectively mitigated than physical risk. The study’s novelty lies in its extensive time coverage from 2000 to 2024, the integration of multidimensional data, and the rigorous application of advanced econometric techniques. This
paper contributes to the literature on green finance in emerging countries and offers concrete implications for public decision-makers and financial institutions in terms of climate strategy.
Downloads
References
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland; 2023. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Network for Greening the Financial System. Running the NGFS Scenarios in G-Cubed: A Tale of Two Modeling Frameworks. Paris, France; 2022. Accessed on 18.11.2025. URL: https://www.ngfs.net/system/files/import/ngfs/medias/documents/running_the_ngfs_scenarios_in_g-cubed_a_tale_of_two_modelling_frameworks.pdf
IEA. World Energy Balances. IEA, Paris; 2024. Accessed on 18.11.2025. URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-balances
World Bank. World Development Indicators. 2023. Accessed on 18.11.2025. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Campiglio E., Dafermos Y., Monnin P., et al. Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change. 2018;(8):462–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0175-0
Zhang B., Wang Y. The Effect of Green Finance on Energy Sustainable Development: A Case Study in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2021;57(12):3435-3454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1695595
Nisamudheen P., Shareef K.H. Assessing the role of green finance in fostering renewable energy transition and sustainable development in India. Discover Environment. 2026;4:62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00427-z
OECD. OECD Guidance on Transition Finance: Ensuring Credibility of Corporate Climate Transition Plans. Green Finance and Investment, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/7c68a1ee-en
He F., Duan L., Cao Y., et al. Green credit policy and corporate climate risk exposure. Energy Economics. 2024;133:107509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107509
Liu X., Liang W., Fu Y., et al. Dual Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Index for Corporate Sustainability Assessment Using Blockchain Technology. Sustainability. 2024;16(10):4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104272
Ghosh B., Pham L., Gubareva M., et al. Energy transition metals and global sentiment: Evidence from extreme quantiles. Resources Policy. 2023;86(A):104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104170
Flammer C. ESG and sustainable investing. The Reporter. 10.10.2023. Accessed on 18.11.2025. URL: https://www.nber.org/reporter/2023number3/esg-and-sustainable-investing?page=1&perPage=50
CDP. Carbon Disclosure Project Annual Report 2023. Accessed on 18.11.2025. URL: https://www.roehm.com/de/detail-nachhaltigkeit/gute-ergebnisse-beim-cdp?file=files/assets/01-corporate/downloads/en/sustainability/CDP%20Results%202023.pdf&cid=31840
Khan H., Gupta S., Kumar V., et al. Managing climate change risks and creating stakeholders' value via sustainability-focused B2B brand strategies. Industrial Marketing Management. 2023;115:198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.09.017
Schoenmaker D., Schramade W. Risk-Return Analysis. In: Corporate Finance for Long-Term Value. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35009-2_12
Spence M. Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1973;87(3):355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Heinkel R., Kraus A., Zechner J. The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2001;36(4):431-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676219
Roodman D. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2009;71(1):135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
Chen L., Msigwa G., Yang M., et al. Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2022;20:2277–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
Copyright (c) 2026 National Research University Higher School of Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.