Possibleness as a psychological construct: psychometric validation
Abstract
The objective of the present study is the psychometrical approbation of the inventory “Psychological Possibleness of Personality” (PPP) by V.A. Petrovsky, based on his metaimplicative model of existential choice and Boolean algebra (Petrovsky, 2002). The study was conducted on two samples: freshmen psychology students (N=88) and professional models (N=57), who were close on socio-demographics, but radically differed on life style and demands for self-regulation. Besides the Psychological Possibleness of Personality inventory, traditional psychometric inventories for study of personality potential were used: Satisfaction with Life Scale by Diener, General Self-Efficacy Scale by Schwarzer, etc. Six measures of the inventory for two types of tasks were compared, as well as for two samples; analysis of variance for these two variables on the measures of PPP was conducted, as well as correlation analysis of measures of PPP and the two additional scales. It was found that in the sample of models no measure of PPP differs significantly for the two types of tasks, while in the sample of students significant (even highly significant, in most cases) differences are found for all measures, except for the availability of the task. In students correlations of all measures of PPP with satisfaction with life don’t differ significantly for the two types of tasks. Their intention and voluntarism are connected with satisfaction with life positively, with judgment and self-control negatively, while connection with availability and attitude is non-significant. In models there are much less significant correlations; an exception is a significant positive correlation with judgment and a negative one with voluntarism for a task “for one’s liking”. The results allow to speak of the heuristicity of the phenomenological model of possibleness and the construct validity of the inventory PPP.
Downloads
References
2. Леонтьев, Д. А. (2006). Личностный потенциал как потенциал саморегуляции. В кн. Б.С.Братусь, Е. Е. Соколова (ред.), Ученые записки кафедры общей психологии МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова (вып. 2, с. 85-105). М.: Смысл.
3. Леонтьев, Д. А. (2011). Саморегуляция как предмет изучения и как объяснительный принцип. В кн. В. И. Моросанова (ред.), Психология саморегуляции в XXI в.(с. 74-89). СПб./М.: Нестор-История.
4. Лефевр, В. А. (1996). Космический субъект. М.: Ин-кварто.
5. Лефевр, В. А. (2004). Алгебра совести. М.: Когито-центр.
6. Моросанова, В. И. (2012). Психология саморегуляции. М./СПб.: Нестор-История.
7. Осин, Е. Н., Леонтьев, Д. А. (2008). Апробация русскоязычных версий двух шкал экспресс-оценки субъективного благополучия. В кн. Материалы III Всероссийского социологического конгресса. М.: Институт социологии РАН/ Российское общество социологов, 2008.
8. Петровский, В. А. (2010). Человек над ситуацией. М.: Смысл.
9. Петровский, В. А. (2013). «Я» в персонологической перспективе. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики.
10. Шварцер, Р., Ерусалем, М., Ромек, В. (1996). Русская версия шкалы общей самоэффективности Р. Шварцера и М. Ерусалема. Иностранная психология, 7, 71-76.