Роль латеральной асимметрии в задаче подавления ответа по компонентам вызванных потенциалов
Ключевые слова:
когнитивный контроль, вызванные потенциалы, Go/NoGo, доминантность руки, глазодоминантность
Аннотация
Исследование посвящено проблеме реализации функции подавления когнитивного контроля у лиц с различными характеристиками латеральной асимметрии – доминантности левой или правой руки или глаза. Группы участников с ведущим правым и левым глазом, а также ведущей правой и левой рукой выполняли задачи Go/NoGo различной перцептивной сложности. В результате обнаружены значимые различия в амплитуде компонентов вызванных потенциалов N200 и P300. Различия в амплитуде N200 в правом височном отведении обнаружены между участниками с правым и левым векторами латеральной асимметрии в двух задачах в обоих условиях (Go и NoGo) в отведении T6 и могут свидетельствовать о независимости процессов цветовой обработки стимулов от необходимости подавления ответа, а также о том, что на раннем этапе обработки стимулов различия между группами касаются обработки их цвета. Различия в амплитуде компонента Р300 представлены в большем диапазоне отведений и могут быть связаны с перцептивной сложностью визуальных стимулов. Использование ресурсов когнитивного контроля различается у групп с право- и левосторонним векторами латеральной асимметрии. В задаче, где целевые стимулы находятся вне фона, больше различий регистрируется в условии, требующем подавления нерелевантного ответа (NoGo); в задаче, где стимулы интегрированы в фон, – в условии, не требующем подавления (Go). Данное обстоятельство свидетельствует о различиях в осуществлении контроля у участников с различными типами латеральной асимметрии в связи с разными типами стимулов.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.
2. Barnett, K. J. (2008). Colour knowledge: The role of the right hemisphere in colour processing and object colour knowledge. Laterality, 13(5), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802146387
3. Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90011-4
4. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A. D., Kyprianou, M., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Investigation of the link between higher order cognitive functions and handedness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.778231
5. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Nanou, E. D., Hountala, C., Maganioti, A. E., Capsalis, C. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2009). Effect of initiation-inhibition and handedness on the patterns of the P50 event-related potential component: A low resolution electromagnetic tomography study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51. Retrieved from http://behavioralandbrainfunctions.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51
6. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2010). Effect of handedness on Stroop Colour Word Task. Laterality, 15(6), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903071104
7. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(12), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5
8. Bruin, K. J., & Wijers, A. A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(7), 1172-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
9. Bryden, P. J., Bruyn, J., & Fletcher, P. (2005). Handedness and health: An examination of the association between different handedness classifications and health disorders. Laterality, 10(5), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000193
10. Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005
11. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R.J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined Go/Nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51(2), 877-887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043
12. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K
13. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301-8306.
14. Halpern, D. F., Haviland, M. G., & Killian, C. D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the medical college admission test. Brain and Cognition, 38(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1021
15. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Henninghausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksentask: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(4), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218
16. Ilyina, M. N., & Ilyin, E. P. (1975). Ob odnom iz uslovii diagnostirovaniya sily nervnoi sistemy po vozbuzhdeniyu s pomoshch’yu tepping-testa [On the one condition of diagnostics of the power of nervous system with the arousal in tapping test]. In Psikhofiziologicheskie osobennosti sportivnoi deyatel’nosti: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Psychophysiological characteristics of sport activity: Collected works] (pp. 183-186). Leningrad: LGPI.
17. Jorgenson, C., Davis, J., Opella, J., & Angerstein, G. (1980). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: an examination of gender, hand-preference, and language differences. International Journal of Neuroscience, 11(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458009147582
18. Khomskaya, E. D., Privalova, N. N., Enikolopova, E. V., Efimova, I. V., Stepanova, O. B., & Gorina, I. S. (1995). Metody otsenki mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii i mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Methods of assessment of hemispheric asymmetry and hemispheric intercommunication]. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
19. Kok, A. (1999). Varieties of inhibition: Manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 101(2-3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00003-7
20. Lazarev, I. E., & Kirenskaya, A. V. (2008). The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials. Human Physiology, 34(2), 150-160.
21. Lewin, J., Kohen, D., & Mathew, G. (1993). Handedness in mental handicap: Investigation into populations of Down’s syndrome, epilepsy and autism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), 674-676. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.163.5.674
22. Li, L., Gratton, C., Yao. D., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans. Brain Research, 1344, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.016
23. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach, & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
25. Perelle, I. B., & Ehrman, L. (1994). An international study of human handedness: The data. Behavior Genetics, 24(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067189
26. Serrien, D. J., & Sovijärvi-Spapé, M. M. (2013). Cognitive control of response inhibition and switching: hemispheric lateralization and hand preference. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.013
27. Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is taskdependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224-232.
2. Barnett, K. J. (2008). Colour knowledge: The role of the right hemisphere in colour processing and object colour knowledge. Laterality, 13(5), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802146387
3. Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90011-4
4. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A. D., Kyprianou, M., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Investigation of the link between higher order cognitive functions and handedness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.778231
5. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Nanou, E. D., Hountala, C., Maganioti, A. E., Capsalis, C. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2009). Effect of initiation-inhibition and handedness on the patterns of the P50 event-related potential component: A low resolution electromagnetic tomography study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51. Retrieved from http://behavioralandbrainfunctions.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51
6. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2010). Effect of handedness on Stroop Colour Word Task. Laterality, 15(6), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903071104
7. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(12), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5
8. Bruin, K. J., & Wijers, A. A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(7), 1172-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
9. Bryden, P. J., Bruyn, J., & Fletcher, P. (2005). Handedness and health: An examination of the association between different handedness classifications and health disorders. Laterality, 10(5), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000193
10. Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005
11. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R.J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined Go/Nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51(2), 877-887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043
12. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K
13. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301-8306.
14. Halpern, D. F., Haviland, M. G., & Killian, C. D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the medical college admission test. Brain and Cognition, 38(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1021
15. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Henninghausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksentask: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(4), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218
16. Ilyina, M. N., & Ilyin, E. P. (1975). Ob odnom iz uslovii diagnostirovaniya sily nervnoi sistemy po vozbuzhdeniyu s pomoshch’yu tepping-testa [On the one condition of diagnostics of the power of nervous system with the arousal in tapping test]. In Psikhofiziologicheskie osobennosti sportivnoi deyatel’nosti: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Psychophysiological characteristics of sport activity: Collected works] (pp. 183-186). Leningrad: LGPI.
17. Jorgenson, C., Davis, J., Opella, J., & Angerstein, G. (1980). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: an examination of gender, hand-preference, and language differences. International Journal of Neuroscience, 11(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458009147582
18. Khomskaya, E. D., Privalova, N. N., Enikolopova, E. V., Efimova, I. V., Stepanova, O. B., & Gorina, I. S. (1995). Metody otsenki mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii i mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Methods of assessment of hemispheric asymmetry and hemispheric intercommunication]. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
19. Kok, A. (1999). Varieties of inhibition: Manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 101(2-3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00003-7
20. Lazarev, I. E., & Kirenskaya, A. V. (2008). The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials. Human Physiology, 34(2), 150-160.
21. Lewin, J., Kohen, D., & Mathew, G. (1993). Handedness in mental handicap: Investigation into populations of Down’s syndrome, epilepsy and autism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), 674-676. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.163.5.674
22. Li, L., Gratton, C., Yao. D., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans. Brain Research, 1344, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.016
23. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach, & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
25. Perelle, I. B., & Ehrman, L. (1994). An international study of human handedness: The data. Behavior Genetics, 24(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067189
26. Serrien, D. J., & Sovijärvi-Spapé, M. M. (2013). Cognitive control of response inhibition and switching: hemispheric lateralization and hand preference. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.013
27. Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is taskdependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224-232.
Опубликован
2018-11-04
Как цитировать
МаракшинаЮ. А., ВартановА. В., & БеспаловБ. И. (2018). Роль латеральной асимметрии в задаче подавления ответа по компонентам вызванных потенциалов. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 14(4), 679-697. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2017-4-679-697
Выпуск
Раздел
Статьи выпуска
