A New Approach to Identifying Political Connections: Evidence from the Russian Banking Sector

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.20.2.2026.108-135

Keywords:

banks, political connections, Russia, corporate governance in banks, cluster analysis

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to identifying and operationalizing political connections of banks. We manually code 2,598 bankers who owned or worked in 115 Russian banks between 2015 and 2021 to classify political connections and uncover their institutional patterns through cluster analysis. We propose a set of variables that capture the origins, relevance, and maturity of political connections, which enable a more theoretically grounded assessment of their effects on business decisions and financial performance. Our findings confirm the prevalence and heterogeneity of political connections in the Russian banking sector and provide a nuanced understanding of how political interests infiltrate bank activities. We document the fact that formal ties to the government, regional authorities, and stateowned companies stand out, being associated with lower capital adequacy and higher lending to the economy. Distinct effects emerge for regulatory and
parliamentary connections. Regarding the timing of connections, those established after a banker joins the bank appear to mitigate state pressure, resulting in lower lending and reduced credit risk. Clustering identifies five groups of banks with distinct configurations of political connections, size, and ownership – from small regional banks with localized connections to large stateowned federal banks with comprehensive political networks, which also exhibit statistically significant differences in financial outcomes.

References

Hillman A.J. Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management. 2005;31(3):464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272187

Faccio M. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review. 2006;96(1):369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704

Rajan R.G., Zingales L. Saving capitalism from the capitalists: Unleashing the power of financial markets to create wealth and spread opportunity. New York: Crown Business; 2003.

Khwaja A.I., Mian A. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2005;120(4):1371–1411. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524

Houston J.F., Jiang L., Lin C., et al. Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research. 2014;52(1):193–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12038

Arifin T., Hasan I., Kabir R. Transactional and relational approaches to political connections and the cost of debt. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2020;65:101768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101768

Rithmire M. Precarious ties: Business and the state in authoritarian Asia. New York: Oxford University Press; 2023.

Khmelnitskaya M. Russian housing finance policy: State-led institutional evolution. Post-Communist Economies. 2014;26(2):149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2014.904104

Viktorov I., Abramov A. The state capture of Russian non-bank financial institutions and markets after the 2008 crisis. Competition & Change. 2016;20(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529415611267

Bian W., Ji Y., Wang P. Political connections and banks’ credit smoothing behavior: Incentives and costs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;68:101606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101606

Wang L., Menkhoff L., Schröder M., et al. Politicians’ promotion incentives and bank risk exposure in China. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2019;99:63–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.013

Chavaz M., Rose A.K. Political borders and bank lending in post-crisis America. Review of Finance. 2019;23(5):935–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy027

Goldman E., Rocholl J., So J. Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies. 2009;22(6):2331–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088

Su Z., Fung H.-G. Political connections and firm performance in Chinese companies. Pacific Economic Review. 2013;18(3):283–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12025

Szakonyi D. Businesspeople in elected office: Identifying private benefits from firm-level returns. American Political Science Review. 2018;112(2):322–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000600

Fisman R. Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review. 2001;91(4):1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095

Boubakri N., Cosset J.C., Saffar W. Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2008;14(5):654–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003

Han J., Zhang G. Politically connected boards, value or cost: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Accounting & Finance. 2018;58(1):149–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12215

Trifonov D.A. Political connections of Russian corporations: Blessing or curse? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 2021;29:100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100458

Frye T.M., Iwasaki I. Government directors and business–state relations in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy. 2011;27(4):642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.06.003

Gao R., Sun P., Grosman A., et al. Corporate political ties and state capitalism. In: Wright M., Wood G.T., Cuervo-Cazurra A., et al, eds. The Oxford Handbook of State Capitalism and the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198837367.013.23

Zhang J., Marquis C., Qiao K. Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organization Science. 2016;27(5):1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1084

Fan J.P., Wong T.J., Zhang T. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007;84(2):330–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008

Chen C.J., Li Z., Su X., et al. Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2011;17(2):229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.09.009

Carretta A., Farina V., Gon A., et al. Politicians ‘on board’: do political connections affect banking activities in Italy? European Management Review. 2012;9(2):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01032.x

Blau B.M., Brough T.J., Thomas D.W. Corporate lobbying, political connections, and the bailout of banks. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2013;37(8):3007–3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.005

Hung C.H.D., Jiang Y., Liu F.H., et al. Bank political connections and performance in China. Journal of Financial Stability. 2017;32:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.09.003

Bertrand M., Kramarz F., Schoar A., et al. The cost of political connections. Review of Finance. 2018;22(3):849–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy008

Abdelsalam O., Mollah S., Tortosa-Ausina E. Political connection and bank in(efficiency). SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2933403

Hasan I., Jackowicz K., Kowalewski O., et al. Politically connected firms in Poland and their access to bank financing. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2017;50(4):245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.10.003

Cegłowski B., Jackowicz K., Kozłowski Ł., et al. Banks, freedom, and political connections: New evidence from around the world. Journal of Financial Stability. 2025;76:101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101353

Okhmatovskiy I. Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management Studies. 2010;47(6):1020–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00881.x

Disli M., Schoors K., Meir J. Political connections and depositor discipline. Journal of Financial Stability. 2013;9(4):804–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.04.005

Farag H., Dickinson D. The power of connections: Evidence from financial companies. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2020;64:101643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101643

Bussolo M., Commander S., Poupakis S. Political connections and firms: network dimensions. Oxford Economic Papers. 2023;75(1):256–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpac017

Gel’man V. The vicious circle of post-Soviet neopatrimonialism in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2016;32(5):455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1071014

Sharafutdinova G. Political consequences of crony capitalism inside Russia. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 2010.